Naive Bayes Classifier is a simple yet powerful algorithm based on Bayes’ Theorem. It is widely used for classification tasks like spam detection, sentiment analysis, and medical diagnosis due to its efficiency and simplicity.
At the core of Naive Bayes lies Bayes’ Theorem, which describes the probability of an event based on prior knowledge:
P(A∣B) = P(B∣A)×P(A) / P(B)
Where:
The “naïve” in Naïve Bayes comes from its assumption that features are independent. This means that one feature does not affect the presence of another. In real-world scenarios, this assumption may not always hold, but the algorithm still performs surprisingly well.
Type | Description | Application Example |
Gaussian Naïve Bayes | Assumes continuous data follows a Gaussian (Normal) distribution | Weather prediction, medical diagnosis |
Multinomial Naïve Bayes | Used for text classification with word counts | Spam detection, sentiment analysis |
Bernoulli Naïve Bayes | Works with binary feature values (0 or 1) | Document classification, fraud detection |
✔ Fast and efficient
✔ Works well with small datasets
✔ Handles categorical and continuous data
✔ Performs well in text classification problems
✘ Assumes independence of features (which may not be true)
✘ Zero probability issue (solved using Laplace Smoothing)
✘ Can be outperformed by more complex models
Algorithm | Speed | Accuracy | Complexity |
Naïve Bayes | High | Moderate | Low |
Decision Tree | Moderate | High | Moderate |
SVM | Low | High | High |
Neural Networks | Low | Very High | Very High |
🔹 Collect Data → 🔹 Calculate Prior & Conditional Probabilities → 🔹 Apply Bayes’ Theorem → 🔹 Classify Data
Yes, Gaussian Naïve Bayes is used for numerical data, assuming a normal distribution.
We use Laplace Smoothing by adding a small value to all probability calculations.
It works well but may not outperform deep learning models on very large datasets.
The Naïve Bayes Classifier is a powerful and efficient classification algorithm, particularly useful in text classification and spam filtering. Despite its simplistic assumptions, it performs well in many real-world applications. However, it may not be the best choice when features are strongly correlated.